The Center for Progressive Reform works to protect and improve the
quality of public debate on environmental, health and safety issues
by promoting a sound regulatory process. Toward that end, CPR scholars
file comments with regulatory agencies, testify before congressional
committees, publish opinion articles, and prepare white papers and
reports. These products build on the academic scholarship and research
conducted by CPR scholars. Recent CPR work on secrecy issues includes:
- Secrecy. Even before September 11, 2001, the Bush Administration
had implemented a number of measures to restrict public access
to information. But the Homeland Security Act has clamped down
even more, restricting the public's right to know, and extending
secrecy to corporate information. (Read CPR
Perspective on Secrecy.)
- Read "Bush White House blocks information to EPA libraries," by Joel Mintz and Rebecca Bratspies, published December 12, 2006 in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, about the Administration's decision to close down this vital source of information for EPA staff, environmental activists and the public.
- Read Joseph Feller's, "In Bush Grazing Decision, Politics, Secrecy Win Again," a description of Administration suppression of a damning environmental impact statement assessing the harm from a Bureau of Land Management grazing policy, published August 18 on the websites of the Center for American Progress and AlterNet.
- Read Rena Steinzor’s May 2004
comments on the Department of Homeland Security’s Procedures
for Handling Critical Infrastructure Information (Interim
Rule).
- Read Rena
Steinzor's comments on the Department of Homeland Security's
proposed rule for handling Critical Infrastructure Information,
in which she writes that "DHS needs to go back to the drawing
board."
- Read Rena
Steinzor's April 21, 2003 op-ed in the Baltimore Sun on
excessive secrecy in the Defense Department's contracting
process for rebuilding Iraq.
- Read Rena Steinzor's article, "Democracy
Dies Behind Closed Doors: The Homeland Security Act and Corporate
Accountability," to be published in a forthcoming issue
of The Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy.
|